on 9/8/01 4:35 PM, SKID Photography at skid@bway.net wrote:
> Alan Womack wrote:
>
>> I took a look at the engine, if you don't use descriptive names you won't be
>> indexed in a usable manner. No on at google is doing to look at
>> image0001.jpg files and decide that was a cake and note it in the index.
>
> But that (not using descriptive terms) defeats the whole purpose of getting
> one's website listed. The point here is not that the image is listed, but
> that the Google site says that the images *might* be copyrighted,
> when it should say that they *are* copyrighted (or some such thing).
I did a search for my own images using every combination I could think of
including my name, aliases, domain name etc etc etc and turned up nothing. I
did however see a lot of very good photographs that I wouldn't have found
otherwise.
I say hooray for google.
--
John Brownlow
