ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: MacWorld Film Scanner Review



There is a factual error in the review.

The reason they couldn't see any difference in resolution between the
Minolta Dual Dimage II (which they indicate has a resolution of 2438
dpi), and the Nikon rated at 2900 dpi, (as they mention in the body of
the article) is because the Minolta Dual Dimage II has a resolution of
2820 dpi.  The older version one (SCSI) had the 2438 dpi resolution. The
newer Dual II is USB interfaced, as mentioned in the chart.

Art
  

Winsor Crosby wrote:
> 
> The MacWorld review of film scanners can be found at
> 
> http://www.macworld.com/2001/10/reviews/filmscanners.html
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.