ðòïåëôù
áòèé÷
Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
óôáôøé
ðåòóïîáìøîïå
ðòïçòáííù
ðéûéôåðéóøíá
> Austin writes: > > > Why? > > Because sarcasm is not seriously intended to generate a rebuttal, > by definition. > Why not?
Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.