ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?



I expect 254dpi is quite common (100dpcm as used by Durst Epsilon)

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shough, Dean" <dean.shough@lmco.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?


> Here is the pdf file that I created that will test your print driver and
see
> what it does at various resolutions.  Make sure that you do not allow
> Acrobat to shrink oversize pages or to expand small pages.
>
>  <<Printer ResizeTest.pdf>>
>
> This file prints out the same image at various resolutions ranging from
239
> dpi up to 2400 dpi.  The image contains slanted, one pixel wide lines,
both
> black on white and white on black.  Sorry, I do not remember who first
> posted the basic image with the suggestion to print it at various
> resolutions - all I did was to combined the various resolutions into one
pdf
> file.
>
> When I print the file on either an Alps MD5000 or a couple of different HP
> laser printers, only the 300 dpi image prints correctly.  All other images
> have been resampled.  I would be interested in the results with other
> printers, especially the Epsons.
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.