ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?



>   Modern printers are definitely approaching "fine" resolutions.
> If you put
> criteria like is common to "fine" B/W prints on today's printers
> ... say, 7
> lines/mm, ... which equates to ~180 pixel pairs per inch, ... then you
> realize there isn't much point in sending finer than 300 pixels/in
> resolutions to your printer.
>
> shAf  :o)

Is this blanket misstatement day ;-)  That depends on the printer driver.
The Piezography driver can use (meaning you get improved results from) data
up to around 720 pixels/inch.  It really diminishes after 420 though, at
least for my images.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.