ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X



Keep in mind that just because a sensor is smaller
than 24x36mm doesn't make your lenses obsolete. It
makes them telephoto, and comparatively high speed at
that. The 200 f2.8 might end up a 300 2.8, which can
costs thousands of dollars. It is all in how one lloks
at it. If I were a sports or nature photographer, I
think I'd be in hog heaven with the magnification
factor.


Pat

--- Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
wrote:
> John writes:
> 
> > The REAL point of getting a 24x36 chip is to
> > make your 35mm lenses be what they're supposed
> > to be. Not some inbetween angle of view as the
> > digital cameras of today are.
> 
> Yes, and until I see that chip, I don't have much
> motivation to move to digital.
> Not when it makes all my existing lenses obsolete.
> 
> Besides, a surface that large would allow for
> extraordinarily high resolution
> with very low noise.
> 


__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.