Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in Vuescan
I've seen this as well. I've stopped worrying about it, because the
differences are never larger enough to present a correction problem in PS.
BTW, since I'm talking about colour corrections, one recommendation I want to
pass on is for iCorrect from Pictographics. I learned about it from Michael
Reichmann's Luminous-Lanscape review. On some images it's a three-click
miracle.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [mailto:mlidaka@ameritech.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:10 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in
Vuescan
This is true, Ed. The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: <EdHamrick@aol.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in Vuescan
| Now that I think of it, this problem may be the reason some
| people say that the scan sometimes looks quite a bit different
| from the preview.
|