ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in Vuescan



I've seen this as well.  I've stopped worrying about it, because the 
differences are never larger enough to present a correction problem in PS.

BTW, since I'm talking about colour corrections, one recommendation I want to 
pass on is for iCorrect from Pictographics.  I learned about it from Michael 
Reichmann's Luminous-Lanscape review.  On some images it's a three-click 
miracle.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [mailto:mlidaka@ameritech.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:10 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in
Vuescan


This is true, Ed.  The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: <EdHamrick@aol.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in Vuescan


| Now that I think of it, this problem may be the reason some
| people say that the scan sometimes looks quite a bit different
| from the preview.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.