ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem in Vuescan



<EdHamrick@aol.com> wrote:
> I'll try to add some code to automatically detect this case, and
> set the mask value to something reasonable.

Great! :)

> >  OK, presumably the preview is ok because it does include the
> >  mask somewhere.
> Yes, the preview probably has some of the unexposed film
> visible around the edges.
> Now that I think of it, this problem may be the reason some
> people say that the scan sometimes looks quite a bit different
> from the preview.

And I don't think the preview compensates if you set the crop box and
preview memory, so the result at the end may be quite a surprise!

Regards,
Rob





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.