Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 07:46 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <ONEFIIEMIMKCGHDLALPAGEMCDBAA.gordon-potter@home.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 07:01:59 -0500  Gordon Potter (gordon-potter@home.com) 
wrote:

>  I have been told resampling is much more destructive to an image
> then  resizing.

You were told wrong. Try it.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
& comparisons

Follow-Ups:
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
  - From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <LAURIE@advancenet.net>

References:
- filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
  - From: "Gordon Potter" <gordon-potter@home.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Re: Emulsion flaws
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan & VS Negative dynamic range
Previous by thread: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread