ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: scanning automation



Larry Berman wrote:
> Sounds like you should have your images scanned to a Kodak Photo CD.

No, no, no. I usually have to place the portion of images on my web site the
day I developed the films. Apart from that Photo CD is almost non-existent
in Poland, where I live.

>From the answers so far, I conclude that for my requirements the LS-4000ED
would be most suitable. How fast is this scanner on an average new computer
when doing this batch scanning in "low" resolution? Bob Kehl uses 2000dpi,
can I choose other, even lower resolutions with this scanner?
Did you ever see those index print stations at minilabs which scan the whole
film within a two ot three minutes? That's what I'd need sometimes. The main
use for the scanner will be (slow) archival scanning at 4000dpi but speed is
sometimes the priority.
Can I still think of the LS-4000ED then?

Regards

Tomasz Zakrzewski




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.