ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Thanks Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1 does not work under W2K (report on tests)



Title: RE: Thanks Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1 does not work under W2K (report on tests)

Stewart,

One thing about your original post, you mention that people who weren't using the Nikon supplied IEEE1394 card had no problems.  An Adaptec IEEE1394 card, which is presumably very good, only costs about $60.  Any thoughts about using one of these as a work around?  A work around that costs money is always less preferable but it might be worth it.

Paul Wilson
 
> At 6:39 PM -0700 14-10-01, Stuart Nixon wrote:
> My testing and feedback from other users has confirmed
> that NikonScan 3.1 does not operate correctly under Windows 2000.
> This software should never have been released in its current
> buggy state.
>



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.