ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.



> I guess I'm missing the point here.  If I were to scan even a 4x6
> print at 72 dpi, and then want to display it anything larger than
> 288x432 pixels, wouldn't interpolation be necessary?  Even more with a
> slide or a negative?

But you wouldn't scan at 72dpi if you wanted larger images (pixel wise that
is), right?




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.