Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
Correct - scan the 4x6 at 300spi, do your adjustments except for final
sharpening, downsample to the pixel size you want to post (you can change dpi
if you want or leave it at 300dpi - it does not matter), then sharpen, compress
and post.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Durling" <kdurling@earthlink.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
| On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:39:14 -0700, you wrote:
|
| >Right, but scan at 72 dpi and you get crap. One day I'll understand
| >all this. ;-)
| >
| >
|
|
| Hold on - thanks to you all, maybe I DO understand this. If scanned
| at 72 dpi, even a 4x6 print would need quite a bit of interpolation to
| get it up to a good screen size, ergo crap. Is that correct?
|
|
|
| Ken
|
- References:
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
- From: Rob Geraghty <harper@wordweb.com>
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
- From: Ken Durling <kdurling@earthlink.net>
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
- From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
- From: Ken Durling <kdurling@earthlink.net>
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
- From: Ken Durling <kdurling@earthlink.net>
|