Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:04:39 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <B7FE04FC.F1A4%wirem@home.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk



> With scanners, saying samples per inch tends to suggest samples within the
> optical resolution of the scanner

Not at all.  A scanner is an analog data acquisition device, and it IS, in
fact, sampling, as in taking samples.

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
  - From: Wire Moore <wirem@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Loading the Polaroid 4000 Filmstrip Carrier?
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread