ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Silverfast Unsharp Mask



RogerMillerPhoto writes ...

> Sharpen only in Photoshop and not at all in Silverfast.  ...

  "Real World PS" would imply something differently.  Blatner & Fraser
separate needs for sharpening into 2 separate phases ... early and late.  A
need for a early sharpening might be because the input device inherently
softens the acquisition.  Whereas the need for "late" sharpening is as a
final step for countering some of the effects (such as resampling) you used
during the editing.  If Silverfast's sharpening is better is debateable, but
you might assume it is a different algorithm especially adapted to scanners.

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.