ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI



"Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Well, it ends up that it's still the absolute best printer for
Piezography,
> much to my delight!

Ah, but the Piezo printer driver completely replaces the Epson one.

> For B&W (Piezography) the 3000 is FAR better than the 1160.  Even the Cone
> boys make that claim.  For color, I don't really know.  What color I
printed
> I thought was pretty bad...but I never really tried to get good photo-like
> color images out of my inkjet printers yet.  Some day I will...

OK, didn't realise you were using Piezo drivers.  Something I have no
experience
with.  I was talking about the imporvements in Epson's drivers from the
older
models to the current ones.  The behaviour of Cone's driver with input
resolution
may be totally different to the Epson drivers.

Rob





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.