ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Canon FS 4000 or Kodak RFS 3600



Dear all:

After 30 years of chemical photography, I am begininng with processing.

Here in Buenos Aires, we can by Nikon (very expensive), Canon and Kodak film
scanners (at aprox, 1000 u$s).

Canon looks very friendly, while Kodak was hard to set up for a Kodak
technician in a recent Show.

Canon has FARE technology but Kodak claims that a complete 36 roll of 35 mm
can be scanned unatended.

I will appreciate any comments before a buying decission.

Regards

Jorge Talkowski
http://members.tripod.com.ar/talko







 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.