Well, another opinion is always welcome.
I realize that absence of dust removal system will cost me some time doing
that manually, but anyway this choice cannot be considered as mistake. I've
heard good opinions about FARE more then once, but apparently noticeable
wider dynamic range would be more important for me due to shooting slides
mostly and especially liking night and twilling scenery.
Would the FS4000 match the SS4000 in this regard I wouldn't hesitate.
Regards,
Alex Z
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:53 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner
> I'm still at this junction struggling between choosing SS4000 or
> FS4000, although for about 90% settled for SS4000.
I do not want to say that FS4000 is better choice
but IMO scanner without infrared channel is just a mistake. You will spend
hours
on dust and scratches removing.
Tom
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
