ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI



The Canon Elan is an excellent camera (I have one) and everyone knows that
it's the quality of the lens not the camera that you need.!!!!!!!!

Denise


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Graham <peegee@btinternet.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI


> well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very
interesting
> reading,
> but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
> Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
> to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4" (among other things) with this is
> plainly ridiculous
> I'm not trying to be a snob here, but really, you gotta get hold of a good
> pro 35mm camera before doing such tests,
>
> paul
>
> http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.