ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: 2700ppi a limiting factor in sharpness?



Lens quality problems are not scanning issues.  They're photographic issues.  
Before scanning, you should have a negative or transparency that is sharp.  If 
it isn't, scanning won't improve anything.  It's possible that a 2700 dpi 
scanner can camouflage some lens defects, but a 4000 dpi scanner is a lot less 
forgiving.  If your negative or transparency isn't sharp, then the best you can 
hope for is that your scanner will produce an equally bad image.  

In a message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:38:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Austin 
Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> writes:

> > Obscanning: Has anyone else noticed the difference in sharpness between
> > their lenses when scanning films?
> 
> Drastic difference, yes!





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.