Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:23:59 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <006701c16b19$62016ea0$202387d9@steve>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk


> Also consider that striping doubles your chances of losing your
> data

NO it does not.  MTBF is NOT additive.  Whether you have 1 or 100 devices
that have a MTBF of 10,000 hours, the MTBF of the system is still 10,000
hours.

References:
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
  - From: "Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: creating correction curves from scannedcalibration chart?
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread