ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images




> My point is that, with RAID 0, if one disk fails the data on all
> the  disks
> is lost.

And if you have one disk, and it fails, all data is lost.

>  Also, MTBF is additive in this case because of what I previously
> said.

No it is NOT.  I designed RAID controllers and disk subsystems, as well as
wrote and reviewed the specs for many a server, and have a lot of experience
in this area.  It is NOT additive at all.  That is a misunderstanding of
what MTBF and failure modes are.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.