ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images



Many motherboard RAID controllers don't have extra processing capacity, 
they just have the hardware controller and firmware for BIOS support.

asia@seratel.ie (Mike Bloor) wrote:

> Preben,
> 
> At 12:34 11/11/01 +0100, you wrote:
> 
>  >Lastly, these stand alone Raid cards - unlike raid solutions on
>  >motherbords -  have their own processors on board which takes over 
> all the
>  >hard work, freeing up your system processor.
> 
> I knew that RAID in software (e.g. as part of Windows NT4) worked on 
> the main CPU, but I thought that PC's with additional RAID hardware on 
> the motherboard (such as many of the Dell servers) off loaded these 
> tasks.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.