ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images



on 11/11/01 10:21 PM, Austin Franklin at darkroom@ix.netcom.com wrote:

>> the limit of a 32bit PCI bus at 133MHz (but still in the limits of an
>> Adaptec 29160 controller)
> 
> The standard PCI bus is 33 MHz (or 66MHz), NOT 133MHz.  Perhaps you mean
> 132M BYTES/sec?  Even at that, you can't get near %80 of that, if you're
> lucky.  132M bytes/sec is the burst rate.  There is substantial overhead on
> the PCI bus that lowers that substantially.
> 
Actually, he did not say "standard", and the current PCI standard _is_ 133
MHz. 33 MHz is ancient technology, 66 MHz is antique technology, 100 MHz is
yesterday's news, and 133 MHz is the current defacto PCI standard.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.