Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:54:30 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <BAEDJOEOCNGMIFIHNDJEKEKJCIAA.rarewolf@roadrunner.nf.net>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

> which may beg the question ... "If I
> want to avoid
> resampling artifacts, is there an optimum res to send to the printer?"  In
> some cases the answer is "yes".

shAf,

What cases do you know of (WRT modern inkjet printers that is)?

>From my experience (WRT modern inkjet printers), the answer has always been
no...

Follow-Ups:
- RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
  - From: "michael shaffer" <rarewolf@roadrunner.nf.net>

References:
- RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
  - From: "michael shaffer" <rarewolf@roadrunner.nf.net>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Quick / Quality Scans - Help
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Quick / Quality Scans - Help
Previous by thread: RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: pixels, printer dots, etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread