ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Light Source (Nikon LS40 vs. Minolta Scan Elite II)



Until recently I had planned to purchase the Nikon LS40 Coolscan IV
filmscanner. But now that I had learned of the brand-new Minolta
Dimage Scan Elite II, I have to think this decision all over.

There are a few features in favor of the Minolta:
- color depth 48bit vs. 36bit (I don't know if this is relevant for
  an amateur),
- multi-pass scanning (Nikon only with VueScan),
- batch-scanning of four mounted slides.

While every manufacturer except Nikon seems to use a fluorescent
lamp as light source, the Nikon scanner comes with a RGB LED array.
Does one type of light source have advantages over the other?

Thanks,
-fritz




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.