ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000




To illustrate what I mean with poor Nikon Ls 4000 sharpness, I have
put a attachment with a jpg file. Vuescan as a reference sofware and same 
settings to the 2 scanners



>Nikon Ls 4000 can not produce equal  sharpness over the whole film area if
>the film are mounted glass less or in a filmstrip. Lack of depth of field.
>
>The test shows that a combination of Canons  sharpness and Nikons scanning
>speed, colors and Dmax should be a nearly perfect  mid end scanner.
>
>Mikael Risedal
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Attachment: sharpness.jpg
Description: JPEG image



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.