ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000



Hello Lawrence
Nice to here from you again.
What kind of drum scanner and price?
Best regards Mikael Risedal



--


>From: Lawrence Smith <lsmith@lwsphoto.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: "filmscanners halftone.co.uk" <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:45:19 -0500
>
>I had the same focus issues with my 8000 although I did not know it at the
>time.  When I replaced it with a drum scanner and compared scans (120 film)
>from the drum to those from the 8000, I discovered that the nikon scans 
>were
>not sharp to the edges.  When viewed by themselves, the nikon scans looked
>pretty good but when viewed side by side with howtek scans, the difference
>was obvious.  I imagine that the nikon glass holders would have solved that
>nicely.  For the money, if you get one that works correctly for you, the
>8000's are amazing units...
>
>Lawrence
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>Lawrence W. Smith Photography
>http://www.lwsphoto.com
>lsmith@lwsphoto.com
>------------------------------
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.