Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: RAID and scratch
on 11/17/01 7:51 PM, Charles Knox wrote:
> In general, the RAID partition would be faster, but not by as much as you
> might think, since it would also be creating more seeks on the primary
> drive, thus slowing it down quite a bit.
Forgot to ask about where the system and application should go. Lets say I
have three disks, one of which is the RAID. I was thinking to use my
smallest drive for my OS and applications (including PS), the RAID
exclusively for images, and a third drive for a second system, misc. backup,
and a partition for scratch. Is this the best way to allocate system,
images, application, and scratch, across the three drives or should they be
grouped differently?
Todd
|
