Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: SCSI vs USB scan speed - Kodak RFS3600

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: filmscanners: SCSI vs USB scan speed - Kodak RFS3600
From: Bob Shomler <bob@shomler.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:16:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <20011120212833.LSP14240.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

Scan rate statistic in Bruce Fraser's CreativePro review of the RFS 3600 film 
scanner:

  Scanning a full frame at maximum resolution takes a little shy of three 
  minutes through SCSI, as opposed to about a quarter of an hour via USB.

Article at
  www.creativepro.com/story/feature/14922.html

I've read that transfer rates are slower for USB vs SCSI, but by 5X?  Is this 
representative of other scanners scan times?


--
Bob Shomler
http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: SCSI vs USB scan speed - Kodak RFS3600
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

References:
- Re: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
  - From: <markthomasz@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: URL: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: LS 4000 depth of field issue - what about LS 30/LS 2000?
Previous by thread: Re: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: SCSI vs USB scan speed - Kodak RFS3600
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread