ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc



I have been notified by my Professional lab and the Professional
Photographers of America not to send processed or unprocessed film through
the US mail due to the new equipment they are using.

Its is best to have all film, "hand inspected". rather than go through the
machines. I understand now that it is best to have it out of the plastic
containers and in a clear "Ziploc" bag so they can see it.

It kind of makes you wonder what it is doing to our bodies. :)

John in OKC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll


| > > I'm leaving for my vacation soon, and although I'd like to evaluate my
| > > camera equipment against various films, film processing and digital
| > > post-processing, there's really no time.
|
| Something else comes to mind - given the current paranoia in the world,
you
| probably want to try to process the film in situ if you have to go through
| baggage checks.  High speed film especially may suffer if the X-ray
scanners
| are pumped up as high as they can go.  Carry the film in hand luggage - I
| think we dicussed this on the list before?
|
| Rob
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.