ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan




>
> Jawed wrote:
> >By vitality I don't merely mean contrast/black-point/white-point.  I also
> >mean the nature of the tonality of the image.  Something related to the
> >question of "gamma" and also the inherent S-shaped response that
> all films
> >have (so far as I know).  So, all the effort I put into
> obtaining the full
> >tonal range in a negative (in the form of a flat scan) is wasted because
> >I get distinctly more pleasing images from Nikon Scan.
>
> Out of interest, which scanner are you using?

LS40.

Jawed




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.