Thank you.
Art
Doug Segar wrote:
> At 04:21 PM 11/25/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>
>>At 02:54 PM 11/25/01, Doug Segar wrote:
>>
>>>Since the Administrator has issued no such notice regarding the hand
>checking film provision, the rule does apply WITHOUT exception.
>>>
>>It is in no way clear that the Administrator has not done this. It is
>difficult to find information on where the changes in security are being
>issued from. For example, the FAA says that they (not the airlines) are now
>restricting the number of bags, but try and find a government order on that.
>I'm not sure where the provision for constant random baggage checks is that
>now occur, either.
>>
>
> Note that final revisions of regs post 09/11 (effective 11/14/2001) can be
>found at
>
>
>
> The file is a large one but for those who do not wish to download it, the
>essential point is that the provision on hand inspection of film (including
>the critical word "shall") is unchanged and there is nothing in the document
>that modifies "certificate holder" authority to change this rule without
>direct authorization by the FAA Administrator .
>
>
> .
>
>
