Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ / 120 ???
David.
Yes, it is better but depending on your use and requirements is it worth the
extra money? Silverfast has developed a multi-scan function for the 4000+
that I am told works well. Have not seen it myself.
I would imagine one could develop a test that showed the differences but I
am not sure you would see that much difference on a practical basis.
One thing I have found out is in the film scanner community one mans
definition of great/wonderful can be less than adequate for another man.
Frankly and at least based on US pricing it is tough to beat the present
Sprintscan 4000 deal.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gordon [mailto:mail@davidgordon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ / 120 ???
This is really a question for David Hemingway but maybe others have
experience...
How much better is the SS4000 + compared to the 'old' 4000? On paper it's
a better bit depth, am I correct? The Firewire doesn't matter, are the
results noticeably better?
And, just for 35mm, will the SS120 produce a better scan than the SS4000
or the 4000+?
--
David Gordon
mail@davidgordon.co.uk
|
