ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro



>  > Why would one buy a  multi format scanner to get the same
>>  size file regardless of format. I don't understand.
>
>Why should the format of the film define the enlargement size?  With a film
>scanner that provides resolution proportional to the film format, providing
>the film is "decent" enough (especially for 35mm), you can make the same
>size "enlargement".
>
>I guess I could ask the question why would anyone buy a multi format scanner
>to get a different size file regardless of format?  I don't understand ;-)

Really.  That goes against the usual wisdom that you can make a 
larger print of the same quality from a larger negative.  Or am I 
misunderstanding you? In a museum exhibit a few years ago of Ansel 
Adams photographs it was very obvious to me that even the small 
prints from the Hasselblad shots suffered in quality compared to the 
very large 4x5  prints.
-- 
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.