I would guess about $250, the tooling costs and limited volume to spread
those costs are why it will be a little pricey. That AN glass is not cheap
either!!
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Op's [mailto:martin@wollongong.apana.org.au]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 5:30 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: 6x8
"Hemingway, David J" wrote:
> Pat,
> Early next year we will be coming out with 6 x 17 panoramic support for
the
> SS120. I would think this would due the trick. There will be a glass
holder
> released to handle the 9 x 17 as well as any other odd formats.
> Regards
> David
>
That's great and have convinced myself that I need the SS120. Other
comments
add up considerably when tabulated.
Bugger Nikon and there attitude towards the customer. Why don't they fix
there
problems I can't see my self even considering or getting the 8000 now. Is it
the same world wide that they stick there head in the sand. Ive had no
response
from them or there agents.
And at what price will the 6x17 holder be?
rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Perez [mailto:patdperez@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:53 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: 6x8
>
> Any chance the SW can be made to scan 6x10? I just
> aquired a Brooks Veriwide, whose image is 56x92.
> Definitely not a common size (7 shots per roll of
> 120).
>
> Pat
>
> --- "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@polaroid.com> wrote:
> > Is there anyone one the list that could send me a
> > sample exposed roll of
> > medium format 6x8. Not used in the US as far as I
> > can tell. Some use in
> > Europe I think. Want to add it to the software.
> > Thanks
> > David
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
>
