ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others



Mikael Risedal wrote:
>  They (Nikon and Polaroid) are equal regarding dynamic range.
Good to hear it.

> Nikons sharpness problem is well known today.
Is it with Nikon so that with automated film feeders there are sharpness
issues and with the manual film strip feeder one can achieve good sharpness?
Or is the Nikon disappointing in either case?

Another question:
Is the NikonScan 3.1.1 software stable and bug-free yet with PCs?

And last question:
Are the 4000dpi scanners from Nikon, Polaroid, Canon and Microtek equal in
terms of film safety, or is any of them prone to add scratches to the film
material?

Regards

Tomasz Zakrzewski
www.zakrzewski.art.pl




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.