All non flat film have a problem in Nikon scanners despite if you are using
manual film holder or the motor unit.. I prefer the manual film holder. (
quick and easy and keep the film flater)
I have seen new scratches in the film surface made by the motor unit in my
2 Nikon scanners LS2000 and 4000..
I don't know if 3.1.1 is stable on a IBM related computer. My pc is a MAC
and if I allocate lot of memory to the software there are no problem with
3.1.1 or the PS plugin. I prefere to use Silverfast and
Vuescan who are faster than NikonScan.. Nikonscan are terrible slow with
filters and CMS on.
Mikael Risedal
--
>From: "Tomasz Zakrzewski" <tomzakrz@ka.onet.pl>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others
>Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:23:47 +0100
>
>Mikael Risedal wrote:
> > They (Nikon and Polaroid) are equal regarding dynamic range.
>Good to hear it.
>
> > Nikons sharpness problem is well known today.
>Is it with Nikon so that with automated film feeders there are sharpness
>issues and with the manual film strip feeder one can achieve good
>sharpness?
>Or is the Nikon disappointing in either case?
>
>Another question:
>Is the NikonScan 3.1.1 software stable and bug-free yet with PCs?
>
>And last question:
>Are the 4000dpi scanners from Nikon, Polaroid, Canon and Microtek equal in
>terms of film safety, or is any of them prone to add scratches to the film
>material?
>
>Regards
>
>Tomasz Zakrzewski
>www.zakrzewski.art.pl
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på
