Correction
The new SA 21 motor unit to my LS 4000 have a opening in the back and does
not curve the filmstrip inside, as my LS 2000 motor unit does.
Its seems that Nikon have solved one problem here. The motor unit in the LS
4000 don't causes any scratches as in my LS 2000
My mistake, sorry
Mikael Risedal
>From: "Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others
>Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 17:32:39
>
>1.Take a filmstrip 6 pictures, let the motor unit drag the film inside,
>normaly curved film hits the unit upper wall when it is mowing inside the
>unit.,
>2. The film also curves inside the motor unit, where else to go? There are
>no opening in the back of the motor unit and the film now are curved in 2
>ways.
>So you are totally wrong that there not can be any new scratches when the
>motor unit are transporting the film inside a LS2000 and 4000
>Mikael Risedal
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Shunith Dutt" <shunith@vsnl.com>
>>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others
>>Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:48:11 +0530
>>
>>
>>"Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others
>>
>>
>> > All non flat film have a problem in Nikon scanners despite if you are
>>using
>> > manual film holder or the motor unit.. I prefer the manual film holder.
>>(
>> > quick and easy and keep the film flater)
>>
>>From what i gather (and experience) the flatness problem is only there
>>with
>>mounted slides that have curved...
>>
>> > I have seen new scratches in the film surface made by the motor unit
>>in
>>my
>> > 2 Nikon scanners LS2000 and 4000..
>>
>>Maybe bad handling? Otherwise it's impossible as no part of the Scanner,
>>except for the film holders, are directly in touch with the film.
>>
>>
>> > I don't know if 3.1.1 is stable on a IBM related computer. My pc is a
>>MAC
>> > and if I allocate lot of memory to the software there are no problem
>>with
>> > 3.1.1 or the PS plugin. I prefere to use Silverfast and
>> > Vuescan who are faster than NikonScan.. Nikonscan are terrible slow
>>with
>> > filters and CMS on.
>>
>>NikonScan crashes on a dual processor machine (PC) - unless the machine is
>>booted in single processor mode... A lot of people say that it is stable
>>on
>>a single processor machine....
>>
>>But, keep in mind that most scanner software do crash... Vuescan - by my
>>experience - is among the most stable....
>>
>>Cheers...
>>
>>
>>
>>---
>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system ().
>>Version: 6.0.303 / Virus Database: 164 - Release Date: 24/11/2001
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på
