ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-40/Vuescan cropping





Mark Otway wrote:

> >> Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of
> >> film.  It should be a standard 8 sprocket holes.  Any variance
> >> has to come from the camera.  Some very cheap ones don't even
> >> register the sprocket holes and vary spacing throughout a film.
>
> Both rolls were shot on a Canon EOS300 - not a particularly 'cheap'
> camera (although some professionals on here may disagree with that ;-).
>

Well !!!!!

> Obviously, since the same camera was used for both it *must* be the film
> that differs.
>
> I think the uneven-spaced frames were from some cheap Agfa film which we
> bought from a SnappySnaps or something whilst on holiday last year. It
> certainly is a real pain to scan, though - I will be sticking to
> Fuji/Kodak in the future.
>

As the previous response - its the camera that creates the uneven spacing
not the film.

Rob






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.