ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-40/Vuescan cropping





Mark Otway wrote:

> >> In their zeal to make totally electronic cameras, Canon eliminated
> >> the sprocket that counts eight holes per frame, replacing it with an
> >> infrared sensor. I'd suggest that plays a role your "nonstandard"
> >> spacing.
>
> Ah. I see. What a PITA. :-(
>
> Having said that, it looks to be a combination of the problem - if Fuji,
> Kodak and all the other films I've used can manage to get the sprocket
> holes spaced at the same distance, I fail to see why Agfa can't.
>
> As I said, I'll just have to stick to the former two types of film.
>
> Mark
> (Novice photographer, but learning quickly :-)

What's down the edges of the film that make it different ffrom Kodak or
Fuji?

rob




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.