ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality(Epson 2450)



Bernhard,
    I would go with c. I scanned a Velvia slide with my Minolta Multi and
had a friend scan the same slide with his 4000 dpi Polaroid, and even up to
Super A3 size, there was virtually no difference, other than the Minolta
scan looked a little sharper, but I attribute that to slightly more contrast
in the scan.
    While I have no doubt a 4000 dpi scan gets more detail, if the printer
-- Epson 1270 in my case -- isn't capable of showing that detail, it goes
for naught.
    Mikel

On 12/6/01 8:31, "Bernie Ess" <albatros.bee@web.de> wrote:

 c) the
> extra 1100dpi is not as essential as some may make us believe.
>
> 
> Greetings bernhard




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.