ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)



Definitely. I agree.

Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------
respond to bdplikaytis@bellsouth.net


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11
Available (new focus test)


> Brian wrote:
> >actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case.
>
> It still comes back to the question of - relative to what?  The
orientation
> according to the scanner, or that displayed on the screen?  Having a
graphical
> interface with the ability to click on a point is harder to code, but very
> intuitive for the user.  Coordinate systems are not.
>
> Rob
>
>
> Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
> http://wordweb.com
>
>
>
>






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.