ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Newbie question



Because the 2200 was only 600 dpi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tourtelot" <tourtelot1@attbi.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Newbie questiond

> Any reason why I would find the Umax Astra 4450 a better choice than the
> discontinued but, by some, highly regarded (and cheap) 2200 any better as
a
> low-priced 1200 film scanner?
>
> TIA
>
> Douglas Tourtelot, CAS
> Seattle, WA
> tourtelot1@attbi.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.