ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: Rescans and archiving



Really?  What Fujichromes does Wilhem give such high marks to?  My early 
Fujichromes oldest have given up a bit since they were shot, maybe 3-7% 
of their color density?  These are from the early 1980's. To me, the 
Kodachromes look better from the same period.

Art

Roger Smith wrote:

> At 11:26 PM +1000 12/12/01, Rob Geraghty wrote:
> 
>> The archival nature of Kodachrome is awesome.  It's a shame that the
>> technology is being displaced by ektachrome in that respect.  However I
>> believe the modern Ektachrome films are much more archival than earlier
>> versions.
> 
> 
>     Yes, that is true, but they still don't match the Fujichromes for 
> longevity, at least according to Henry Wilhelm.
> 
> Regards,
> Roger Smith
> 
> .
> 






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.