ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: scanning PAN-F (was: Polaroid Rebate)



Rob,

a few months later I can state that PAN-F scans a lot better, with respect
to the D-Max problems, with my new Canon FS4000 (and latest Vuescan
version).

Alessandro Pardi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:harper@wordweb.com]
> Sent: sabato 28 luglio 2001 04.40
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: scanning PAN-F (was: Polaroid Rebate)
> 
> 
> "Alessandro Pardi" <alessandro.pardi@inferentia.it> wrote:
> > I did. I experimented with various settings (long exposure 
> pass, exposure,
> > gamma etc.) but it seems that the most dense parts of PAN-F 
> are beyond
> reach
> > for this scanner
> 
> I wonder if anyone has tried PAN-F with a SS4000 or other 
> Polaroid scanner?
> 
> Rob
> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.