ok, here's the comparison of VS v NS using the LS4000ED, with positive and
negative examples:
It seems to me that VueScan wins hands down for color fidelity and overall
image quality, but NikonScan is ever so slightly better than VS for IR
cleaning, especially for (positive) slides. Personally I'm staying with VS
for everything unless a slide is very dirty, in which case I'll use NS and
spend the time trying to match VS's color fidelity in PS.
--
-szt
Stephen Z. Turney
-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of William Todd
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:01 PM
To: szturn@home.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Fwd: RE: VueScan 7.3.9 Available
Interesting images, but all the dirt is black. How does they handle white
spots (that need darkening)?
>X-From_: filmscanners-owner@halftone.co.uk Thu Dec 27 17:47:05 2001
>X-Envelope-From: szturn@home.com
>Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:37:50 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>Importance: Normal
>X-Envelope-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Sender: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>From: "szt" <szturn@home.com>
>Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
>To: ttodd@cais.com
>Subject: [filmscanners] RE: VueScan 7.3.9 Available
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by brap-5.cais.net id
>fBRMl4031790
>
>VS 7.3.9 is much better at cleaning than recent previous releases IMHO, but
>it's still not quite there, at least when compared with NikonScan 3.1.2. My
>comparison using an LS4000ED can be viewed at:
>
>
>
>--
>-szt
>Stephen Z. Turney
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the
title or body
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the
title or body
