> I can say exactly the same things about the Epson 2450 - I ´didn´t have a
> good feeling about spending a huge amount of data for a dedicated medium
> format scanner like the Polaroid 120 or the Nikon 8000. So luckiliy a
> photographer pointed me towards the Epson 2450 and I am very glad I went for
> this low cost but high quality machine.
I feel the same as you about the price/performance-ratio of MF film
scanners. Did you use any other scanner for MF before Epson? Right now I'm
wondering if it would make sense for me to upgrade from an Umax Astra 4000
to the Epson. Don't know if the difference is that huge.
High-Res flatbed scanners are becoming the poor medium-format mans film
scannner.
Regards
Johnny
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body