Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: SS4000
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: SS4000
- From: "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@polaroid.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:28:47 -0500
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Somehow I think there may be a compliment in there :)
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Tris Schuler [mailto:tristanjohn@mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:39 AM
To: hemingd@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: SS4000
>I own the 4000 ED and owned the SS4000.
>
>It was a mistake. The Polaroid is a better scanner. The only advantage of
>the Nikon is ICE. Dust isn't as big a problem on the Polaroid. The edge
>softness IS there.
>
>Keep the Polaroid.
>
>Tom
In a way I disagree. The Polaroid resolves lint strands down to one pixel
in width! (Not that anyone but me would be in there editing that stuff out.
<g>)
Tris
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
