ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: MF scanners



Bernie Kubiak wrote:
> I think camera shop staff are trained to say "I recommend Nikon."  I don't
> have the MF version of the Polaroid scanner but a friend does (he bougth
it
> when he got frustrated waiting for the Nikon unit to ship) and he's been
> very happy with it.

Nikon and Polaroid. This list seem not to consider the Minolta MF scanner.
I decided to buy this one. Nikon is too expensive, and can't use strips of 3
6x7 frames, also has problems with DOF and too low dmax for b&w silverbased
films (I proved it myself). The Polaroid is an *excellent* scanner but also
too expensive and doesn't have ICE, which is a huge drawback if, apart from
your regular stuff, you also have some archival stuff to scan.

Regards

Tomasz Zakrzewski

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.